Need somewhere to start? How about the most wanted pages; or the pages we know need more work; or even the stub that somebody else has started, but hasn't been able to finish. Or create a ticket for any issues you have found.
Did You Know?
All content on MIKE2.0 and any contributions you make are published under the Creative Commons license. This allows you free re-use of our content as long as you add a brief reference back to us.
Traditionally, CIOs run their firms’ tech factories and respond to business needs with their solutions. But with BT, organizations directly contract for solutions, configure their own processes in ERP and analytics systems, or employ Web 2.0 technologies like blogs and wikis. Nearly 20 percent of the 600 senior business executives in a Forrester survey self-identified as either entirely responsible or more responsible than IT for choosing vendor-provided solutions and negotiating and managing the relationship. And this number was doubled for fast-paced functions like sales and marketing.
Debra Logan of Gartner makes some great points in her blog titled “How Can Information Governance Succeed?” Our natural tendency to focus on the short term and personal, versus the long term and societal is often the downfall of community and group ventures. We simply forget the importance of handing off the torch before exiting the race. Have you seen any recent successes in Information Governance that can speak to the contrary? What, in your experience, was the piece that kept it together?
The Information Management (IM) space is quite hot these days. There are multiple tools coming into the market to put the power of knowledge in the hands of business users. These are also coming to the aid of IT Teams, in reducing their workloads, and enabling them to focus more on the data and information governance aspects. But quite often we lose track of the important principles that we need to follow. Albeit these are not quite difficult to follow, but are essential. .
