Add Portlet
|
Archive for the ‘Information Development’ Category
Thursday, March 18th, 2010
Stephen Few writes an interesting blog outlining the issues faced by BI software providers today. For the last decade or so, these companies have been successful at building data warehouses and production reporting systems but now face an entirely different problem: how to make sense of the data.
SAP thinks they have a contender to solve the need for such analytics in BI: BusinessObjects Explorer. MIKE2.0 is working on our open source solution offering as well (http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/BI_and_PM_Offering_Group) Have you tried either of these? Do you know of any other solutions out there that can help make sense of and transform business data into workable intelligence?
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Milan Kučera
Milan has more than nine years of experience in Information Technology with a major emphasis on business intelligence, data warehousing, analytical CRM, ETL processes and data warehouse design.
As the Director of Data Architecture for a large Telecom in Prague, he was responsible for the development of job descriptions and department descriptions with the authority and responsibility for defining both personal and departmental KPIs.
He has substantial experience with business case development and development of different RFP/RFIs (metadata management, information management, information quality, data warehouse, ETL and data cleansing). He is also very knowledgeable about information quality tools.
Mr. Kučera prefers to coach over strong line management. This ensures continuous staff improvement (training, re-training). He is a TIQM® (Total Information Quality Management) certified consultant. TIQM, developed by Larry English, applies Kaizen® quality principles to information quality management. Mr. Kučera developed a unique market methodology called Company Information Quality Assessment (CIQA) and used it to analyze a state of management of quality information. This methodology applied the CMM (Capability Maturity Model) based on Philip Crosby”s Management Maturity Grid from his book “Quality is Free“.
Mr. Kučera has written more that 30 articles discussing business intelligence, data mining, data warehouse, information quality and data management issues. He was the first to promote information quality in the Czech market.
Connect with Milan.
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Saturday, March 13th, 2010
| |
Business Solution Offerings
MIKE2.0 Business Solutions provide recommendations for solving a number of business problems for which information management is critical to success.
Initial MIKE2.0 Business Solutions include:
Feel free to check them out when you have a moment- we’re always open to suggestions.
Sincerely,
MIKE2.0 Community
|
| |
 |
|
|
This Week’s Food for Thought:
SaaS for Business Intelligence: Factors to Consider
Business intelligence as a service will be a major trend this year, at least according to the companies selling it. Quentin Gallivan, CEO of BI-as-a-service provider PivotLink, thinks BI-as-a-service growth will outpace on-premise BI in 2010. The majority of folks surveyed by Kognitio, another BI-as-a-service provider, predicted a similarly rosy future for SaaS BI
Read the complete post.
How to Ensure Online Collaboration Adds Business Value
A recent post on eDiscovery Journal notes 8 ways to ensure online collaboration projects add business value:
1. Understand that collaboration is a process, and a subset of broader executive set business outcomes.
2. Control of information is necessary to mitigate risk.
3. The importance of Records management.
4. Understand your content sources and types to be able to track and analyze them.
5. Use a solid collaboration platform (the author in this post recommends Microsoft SharePoint) to work from.
6. Educate management and employees on the goals and benefits of collaboration for positive participation.
7. Consider the knowledge worker and do not overload him or her.
8. Utilize Records management for back end and administrative tasks.
Do you agree or disagree? Based on your experience, can you recommend any others to add?
Read complete post.
|
|
 |
|
|
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Thursday, March 11th, 2010
A recent post on eDiscovery Journal notes 8 ways to ensure online collaboration projects add business value:
1. Understand that collaboration is a process, and a subset of broader executive set business outcomes.
2. Control of information is necessary to mitigate risk.
3. The importance of Records management.
4. Understand your content sources and types to be able to track and analyze them.
5. Use a solid collaboration platform (the author in this post recommends Microsoft SharePoint) to work from.
6. Educate management and employees on the goals and benefits of collaboration for positive participation.
7. Consider the knowledge worker and do not overload him or her.
8. Utilize Records management for back end and administrative tasks.
Do you agree or disagree? Based on your experience, can you recommend any others to add?
Posted in Information Development | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Dan Power
Dan is President of Hub Solution Designs, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in Master Data Management and Data Governance.
Prior to founding Hub Solution Designs, he was the general manager for Dun & Bradstreet’s strategic alliance with Oracle Corporation.
Mr. Power has twenty years of experience in management consulting, enterprise applications, strategic alliances, marketing, corporate strategy, project management and entrepreneurship at companies like Deloitte & Touche, Computer Sciences Corporation, eCredit and Parson Consulting.
He has worked with Oracle’s MDM, ERP and CRM platforms for more than twelve years. He is frequently an invited speaker at technology conferences and has written several articles for publications such as DM Review. He regularly advises clients on developing & implementing high impact MDM strategies.
He studied Computer Science at Princeton University, and earned a Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurial Studies from Babson College in Wellesley, MA.
Connect with Dan.
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Monday, March 8th, 2010
| |
Get Featured in our Member Profile Listings!
Every week, MIKE2.0 features a new community member, their experience and recent contributions in the IM space. If you’re interested in joining our other members in the spotlight, feel free to drop us a line.
Sincerely,
MIKE2.0 Community
|
| |
 |
|
|
This Week’s Food for Thought:
Structured Dynamics donates Open SEAS to MIKE2.0
Structured Dynamics (SD) recently donated its Open SEAS methodology for Semantic Enterprise Adoption and Solutions to the MIKE2.0 (Method for an Integrated Knowledge Environment) project. Open SEAS provides a framework for an enterprise to establish a coherent, consistent and interoperable semantic layer across its information assets. MIKE2.0 complements that by providing a complete open source delivery environment and methodology for information management projects in the enterprise.
Read the press release.
Is it Possible to Quantify the Business Value of MDM?
Organizations have long struggled to identify data as a corporate asset, and like all other corporate assets, it needs to be maintained, serviced and worth the investment.
Nitin Joshi, senior business analyst at Wipro Technologies, suggests that Net present value is one of the better methods to quantify the benefits of master data management, and that it may also justify the choice of a project in the capital budgeting process.
In your experience, is it possible to quantify the business value of MDM, and if so, how would you recommend IM professionals to approach this task?
Read complete post.
To many organisations an Intranet is merely a repository for documents and some kind of informative web interface where news can be published. Unfortunately, this thinking governs how modern Intranets are being designed for the future and limiting their potential value to the organisation.Despite having access to web 2.0 tools such as wikis or blogs, the teams have not realised that the modern Intranet is an incredibly powerful tool.
Read complete post.
|
|
 |
|
|
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Thursday, March 4th, 2010
Organizations have long struggled to identify data as a corporate asset, and like all other corporate assets, it needs to be maintained, serviced and worth the investment.
Nitin Joshi, senior business analyst at Wipro Technologies, suggests that Net present value is one of the better methods to quantify the benefits of master data management, and that it may also justify the choice of a project in the capital budgeting process.
In your experience, is it possible to quantify the business value of MDM, and if so, how would you recommend IM professionals to approach this task?
Posted in Information Development | 5 Comments »
Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Pieter Stroop
Pieter Stroop is a member of the management team of Experian Nederland and responsible for Experian’s data quality solutions in the Netherlands.
He is also chairman of the data quality commission of the DDMA (Dutch Dialogue for Marketing Association), co-organizer of the DDMA Data Quality Day and one of the first supporters of the DDMA Data Quality Award.
At Experian, Stroop founded the data quality department, which did not exist in the Netherlands until 2003.
Pieter Stroop speaks regularly about data quality subjects at events like the Masterclass Data Quality Management at the Nyenrode Business Universiteit and is a regular host and speaker at data quality events.
Connect with Pieter.
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Saturday, February 27th, 2010
| |
Tips for Contributing to MIKE2.0
If you are contemplating adding a new Solutions Offering to MIKE2.0, here are some guidelines and tips.
Get Familiar with Existing Content
Become familiar with the existing MIKE2.0 articles. Peruse the 731 articles already on the site. The easiest way to do so is to go to the Special pages link (found in the upper right box under the Wiki tab), then the All pages link under List of pages. From that page, you will then be able to see a full listing by clicking on the various links at the bottom (e.g., links at bottom). As you peruse these articles:
- Read pages of interest, note possible ones that you may want to refer to or link to as you develop your Offering write-up
- Make special note of which pages you may need to return to in the future with updates or modifications once you begin adding content about your new Offering
- Note gaps in the key concepts necessary to explain your Offering
- Make sure that you will be drafting an Offering in its proper group. (new Core or Foundational Solutions should be rare; Composite Solutions as well; if you want to create one of those, make sure to get in touch with one of the members of the MIKE2:Leadership Team) Then, begin to map out what content needs to be written.
- Also make sure to familiarise yourself with the MIKE2.0 category structure. Again, go to the Special pages link, then the Categories link under List of pages. You will see major clusters of content and patterns in the category names themselves. The number of members for each category is a count of sub-categories (if any) and articles. And you can assign your solution offering pages to these categories to link them with other content on the site.
Begin Preparing Your Content
- Depending on which group of Solution Offering at hand, there is a starting Creation Guide. These are, in essence, structured and organized document templates for what content should be in your Offering. Please first refer to the appropriate guide in order to prepare the keystone document for your Offering. Look carefully at other Solution Offerings in your chosen group to see how they have been written and constructed. Once done, prepare your Offering overview
- You may also need to prepare various images for your Offering. Depending, that might include architectural diagrams, flowcharts, schematics, or the like. You will see the appropriate kinds of figures based on your review of similar Solution Offerings. You may also want to check out the What is MIKE2.0 page, which contains many of the high-level MIKE2.0 diagrams. Another common figure is the Mike2 Solution Groups, which has many variants in that it uses red highlighting to place Solution Offerings in context
- You will likely identify other patterned content from your initial MIKE2.0 review that should be prepared. Examples include articles related to particular steps within The 5 Phases of MIKE2, current or future states of implementation, guiding principles, etc. Also likely is that you will discover missing content specific to your Offering that provides important background or explanatory material. This content, too, should be prepared
- Also, as suggested during the review step, you will likely find that certain terminology or concepts is missing within the current MIKE2.0 content to adequately explain your offering. The convention is to title each of these as “New Concept”, write it with a short explanation and a link to its corresponding Wikipedia article, and then to place it into the Concept Article category
- In all cases, try to be attentive to assign your various articles into the proper MIKE2.0 categories. This helps keep the site organized and more easily navigated.
Monitor, Update and Expand
- Remember, MIKE2.0 is an active collaboration framework. Expect that others will modify and enhance what you have initially written. Make sure to visit your content on a periodic basis
- Updates are also important. As you learn more in your own local practices, bring those lessens back to your MIKE2.0 Offerings to keep them fresh and current. This might mean updating or changing some of your existing contributions, or adding new articles that deepen the material in the chosen area
- Lastly, continually look for making linkages and connections across the entire suite of MIKE2.0 content. Try to refer to other articles and increase the number of appropriate links across articles. It is in this manner that the whole structure and usefulness of MIKE2.0 is increased for all.
Sincerely,
MIKE2.0 Community
|
| |
 |
|
|
This Week’s Food for Thought:
Agile Team Spaces: Do’s and Don’ts
Many of us, who are new to Agile, would believe that putting an Agile team together in a room gets the job done. A few of us would actually pay attention to what makes a room a team room which can enhance productivity and motivation. Many Agile teams have already shared their perspective on what would make an ideal team room. Here are a few recent ones.
Read complete post.
Tips for Deploying Data Matching
Data Matching is about linking entities in or between databases, where these entities are not already linked with unique keys.Data Matching may be deployed in some different ways, including:
- External Service Provider
- Internal Processing
- Embedded Technology
- SOA Components
- Cloud Computing
Read complete post.
I was on the phone with someone the other day who has been in the E2.0 space for quite a while and is someone that I trust. We where chatting a bit about E2.0 and the marketplace. The question of, “is there really a market for E2.0,” came up. We know that there are several vendors/tools in the E2.0 space and there are also several consultants that offer E2.0 services. Apparently many companies do believe and understand that Enterprise 2.0 is valuable, but if that’s the case then why aren’t the handful of consultancies in the Enterprise 2.0 space making a killing?
Read complete post.
|
|
 |
|
|
Posted in Information Development | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Matthias Leybold
Matthias Leybold has over 8 years experience in the field of information management, primarily dealing with unstructured content. He is currently a Senior Manager at Deloitte in Switzerland.
His areas of key interest and expertise include enterprise search and the analysis of natural language as well as enterprise communications which deals with the whole value chain from template management for document driven processes, document creation at runtime and, finally, multi-channel publishing of these documents. In addition to leading the Swiss ECM practice at Deloitte Consulting, he most often acts as engagement manager or subject matter expert.
Connect with Matthias.
Posted in Information Development, Member Profiles | 2 Comments »
|
|
|